Introduction: separating external signals from internal rules
Industrial compliance programs often blur two distinct capabilities: regulatory intelligence (watching and interpreting external change) and policy management (codifying and enforcing internal rules). Treating them as one creates blind spots, stalled audits, and fragmented workflows. This guide clarifies roles, interfaces, and KPIs—and shows how Parakeet connects both ends of the loop with AI and automation.
Why the two terms get conflated
-
Both touch regulations and controls, but at different layers: outside-in (regulatory intelligence) vs inside-out (policy management).
-
Both generate audit evidence, yet from different artifacts: change logs and impact analyses vs policies, procedures, attestations, and mapped controls.
-
Tooling convergence: modern platforms combine change monitoring, workflow, and documentation, masking the underlying distinctions.
Clear definitions
Regulatory intelligence (RI)
Continuous monitoring, contextualization, and impact analysis of external obligations (laws, regulations, standards, guidance, and enforcement actions). Outputs include change alerts, summaries, applicability determinations, impact statements, and recommended actions for affected business units. In industrial contexts, RI spans safety (EHS), quality (GMP), data integrity (e.g., 21 CFR Part 11), and sector guidance (e.g., FDA/EMA), feeding risk registers and remediation planning. See Parakeet’s Pharmaceutical Compliance Suite and Rosella AI Compliance Agent.
Policy management (PM)
Authoring, approving, publishing, versioning, and retiring internal policies and procedures; mapping them to controls, training, and audits; capturing evidence and exceptions; recording attestations; and scheduling reviews/renewals. PM operationalizes obligations into day-to-day behavior with traceable accountability. See Parakeet’s Features and Certification Automation for policy/control workflows aligned to ISO programs.
Side-by-side comparison
| Dimension | Regulatory intelligence | Policy management | Primary outcomes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Scope | External obligations and change signals (laws, guidance, standards) | Internal rules, procedures, controls, training, attestations | Timely awareness; scoped impact vs consistent execution; audit-ready evidence |
| Cadence | Continuous monitoring; event-driven alerts | Periodic reviews plus change-driven updates | Reduced surprise vs reduced drift |
| Core artifacts | Change log, applicability matrix, impact analysis, risk updates | Policies/SoPs, control maps, training plans, attestations, evidence packs | Decision memos vs controlled documents |
| Stakeholders | Legal, regulatory affairs, risk owners, EHS/QA | Process owners, infosec/quality/EHS, HR/L&D, internal audit | Informed leaders vs accountable operators |
| Integrations | Regulatory feeds, QMS, risk registers | HRIS/LMS, doc repos, ticketing/collab tools, calendars | Signal ingestion vs execution orchestration |
| KPIs | Time-to-detect, time-to-impact, false positives, coverage | Policy adoption, on-time reviews, attestation rates, control effectiveness | Responsiveness vs reliability |
Operating model: how RI drives PM
1) Detect: RI captures a new/updated obligation and summarizes the delta. 2) Decide: risk owners assess applicability and materiality. 3) Design: PM updates policies/controls, drafts procedures, and assigns owners. 4) Deploy: train, attest, and operationalize changes. 5) Demonstrate: evidence collection and continuous assurance. Parakeet supports end-to-end orchestration via Continuous Compliance and integrated workflows.
Industrial scenarios
-
Manufacturing EHS: A revised confined-space entry rule triggers RI alerts; PM updates the EHS policy, refreshes job safety analyses, schedules training, and logs attestations. Coordinate via EHS Control Center and collaboration integrations (e.g., Slack, Microsoft Teams).
-
Pharma GMP/21 CFR Part 11: FDA guidance changes are ingested by RI; PM updates SOPs, access controls, and validation documents in the QMS, then tracks evidence for inspections. See Pharma and Rosella.
-
Supplier compliance: New packaging safety standard emerges; RI flags impacted SKUs and vendors; PM updates supplier policy, COI requirements, and audit checklists, then monitors attestations and expirations. See Packaging & Consumer Goods and COI automation.
Metrics that prove performance
-
Regulatory intelligence
-
Signal coverage by jurisdiction/standard
-
Mean time to detect (MTTD) and to decision (MTTDc)
-
% of changes with impact analysis completed
-
Risk score deltas incorporated into registers
-
Policy management
-
On-time policy reviews/renewals
-
Attestation and training completion rates by role
-
Control mapping completeness to standards (e.g., ISO 9001/14001/45001/50001)
-
Audit readiness: evidence completeness and cycle time
How Parakeet implements both ends of the loop
-
Signal capture and analysis: Rosella AI Compliance Agent automates regulatory change capture, evidence synthesis, and risk assessments; outputs feed risk registers and playbooks.
-
Orchestration and assurance: Continuous Compliance coordinates incident/crisis workflows, ongoing monitoring, and table-top exercises with integrated communications.
-
Policy/control lifecycle: Certification Automation streamlines gap analysis, policy and control management, evidence collection, and auditor coordination for ISO programs.
-
Documentation and collaboration: Integrations with Google Docs, Trello, and Google Calendar automate document generation, tasking, and deadline tracking; HR/finance systems (e.g., Workday, BambooHR, ADP, Sage, QuickBooks, NetSuite) keep policies, roles, and evidence aligned with real operational data.
Implementation checklist in Parakeet
-
Define obligation inventory and jurisdictions in Rosella; subscribe to relevant regulatory domains.
-
Map business processes to standards in Certification Automation and create policy/control catalogs.
-
Configure owners, review cadences, and approval workflows in Features.
-
Connect HRIS/LMS and collaboration tools to drive role-based training, attestations, and notifications.
-
Automate evidence generation from assessments, audits, and incident records; store as immutable artifacts.
-
Instrument KPIs and dashboards; schedule table-top exercises in Continuous Compliance.
When to prioritize one over the other
-
Start with regulatory intelligence if your risk posture is frequently surprised by late-breaking changes or multi-jurisdiction complexity.
-
Start with policy management if your biggest gaps are outdated documents, missed reviews, or low attestation/training completion.
-
Mature programs invest in both—and connect them—so external change reliably drives internal action with measurable outcomes.